Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) is a BDC that has benefited considerably from rising rates of interest. Round 94% of GLAD’s funding portfolio is made up of floating price investments which have seen ever-increasing web funding revenue [NII] for the BDC amidst a rising charges setting. Nonetheless, this larger price setting is prone to finish quickly, with some decline in rates of interest more and more seemingly. Whereas these decrease charges are prone to have a damaging affect on NII, the dividend seems protected in the interim. However, the BDC’s elevated valuation stage sees me score GLAD as a maintain in the interim.
The portfolio and danger administration
Most BDCs present some form of reporting on inner danger scores on portfolio investments. Gladstone likewise stories on inner danger scores. Nonetheless, not like different BDCs which I’ve lined similar to Hercules Capital (HTGC) and Trinity Capital (TRIN), Gladstone doesn’t present detailed reporting on portfolio actions between completely different danger score classes. As an alternative, Gladstone solely stories on the bottom danger score assigned to any funding, the best danger score assigned, the common danger score and the danger weighted common score of the portfolio as a complete.
Whereas that is much less beneficial than the extra detailed reporting offered by another BDCs, it nonetheless provides vital perception into will increase in portfolio danger. In Gladstone’s newest 10Q report, the danger administration system is defined:
the Adviser makes use of a proprietary danger score system. Whereas the Adviser seeks to reflect the NRSRO programs, we can’t present any assurance that the Adviser’s danger score system will present the identical danger score as an NRSRO for these securities. The Adviser’s danger score system is used to estimate the likelihood of default on debt securities and the anticipated loss, if there’s a default. The Adviser’s danger score system makes use of a scale of 0 to >10, with >10 being the bottom likelihood of default. It’s the Adviser’s understanding that almost all debt securities of Decrease Center Market corporations don’t exceed the grade of BBB on an NRSRO scale, so there could be no debt securities within the Decrease Center Market that might meet the definition of AAA, AA or A. Due to this fact, the Adviser’s scale begins with the designation >10 as the perfect danger score which can be equal to a BBB from an NRSRO; nonetheless, no assurance might be given {that a} >10 on the Adviser’s scale is the same as a BBB or Baa2 on an NRSRO scale. The Adviser’s danger score system covers each qualitative and quantitative facets of the enterprise and the securities we maintain.”
In its most up-to-date earnings report, the weighted common danger score of the portfolio improved from 7.5 within the earlier quarter to 7.7. It is a promising improvement provided that the persistently high-rate setting has lengthy been anticipated to pose a problem to BDCs by way of deteriorating asset high quality, given the challenges some debtors face in assembly their credit score commitments. Fitch has lately indicated that the BDC sector as a complete has confronted elevated asset high quality dangers in current quarters.
In line with Fitch, the BDC sector as a complete reported a median decline in web asset worth (NAV) of round 0.7% and an trade common non-accrual price of round 1.4% at truthful worth. In its most up-to-date quarter, GLAD noticed a 2% enhance in NAV, which though not significantly excessive is kind of a bit larger than the trade common. However, the BDC’s non-accrual ranges at round 2.1% of the portfolio is considerably larger than the trade common.
The security of the dividend
In current months, a number of Searching for Alpha analysts have expressed concern over GLAD’s means to take care of its comfy dividend protection ought to rates of interest decline. The Gaming Dividend lately noticed that “if rates of interest are minimize and web funding revenue is negatively impacted, there’s an opportunity that the distribution would not be capable of be supported by GLAD’s portfolio investments.” These legitimate considerations come up from the BDC’s robust reliance on floating price investments which have considerably benefited from the high-interest price setting.
Nonetheless, as The Gaming Dividend additionally appropriately observes, there may be little danger of a dividend minimize within the quick time period provided that the dividend remains to be comfortably lined by web funding revenue (NII). In its most up-to-date quarter, the BDC reported a dividend totally lined by NII with an NII protection ratio of round 111%. The 1-year common NII protection ratio can be round 107% indicating that the dividend remains to be properly lined.
However, traders would wish to observe price developments carefully as sooner than anticipated price cuts might see a considerable decline in GLAD’s NII provided that greater than 90% of its portfolio consists of floating price investments. The present dividend might not be sustainable ought to rates of interest decline considerably within the months forward. At current, I don’t count on a considerable drop in rates of interest within the close to time period, albeit that some rate of interest cuts are more and more anticipated within the months forward. The Secured In a single day Financing Fee [SOFR] price, which is the speed utilized by GLAD to hyperlink its portfolio’s rates of interest to, has already declined from a 3-month excessive of round 5.4% on the finish of June to round 5.34%.
Valuation
GLAD is at present buying and selling at a premium to NAV of just below 13%, which is the best of the BDCs thought of within the peer comp chart under. Additionally it is broadly in keeping with the BDC’s three-year common premium to NAV of round 12.7%. Nonetheless, in my opinion, the danger of rate of interest cuts has not been adequately priced into GLAD’s valuation.
The premium to NAV is way larger than that of BDCs whom I consider to be higher positioned to take care of their dividends even within the occasion of price cuts, similar to Ares Capital (ARCC). Given this actuality, I at present price GLAD as a maintain.
Conclusion
The advance in GLAD’s weighted common danger score of its portfolio presents a constructive improvement and indicators that the BDC may properly retain the low non-accrual ranges at present reported. Nonetheless, in my opinion, GLAD instructions a premium to NAV that’s too excessive given the present danger of declining NII as rates of interest come down. Whereas the dividend is unlikely to be minimize within the close to time period, the BDC doesn’t have a big cushion to take care of the dividend ought to charges decline sooner than anticipated. Given these components, I at present contemplate GLAD a maintain.