Rebecca Rettig, accomplice at FisherBroyles, talks about Kik’s reply this week to the SEC’s criticism, why she predicted they might make this transfer versus submitting a movement to dismiss as many had anticipated and what their principal arguments had been. We focus on the important thing factors of their reply, resembling the excellence they make between their SAFT sale to accredited traders vs. the token sale to most people, how we might get new regulation utilized to tokens in addition to how the SEC took quotes out of context to make it seem that Kik and/or its board members and different associates stated the alternative of what they meant.
Thanks to our sponsors!
Crypto.com: https://crypto.com
CipherTrace: http://ciphertrace.com/unconfirmed
Episode hyperlinks:
Rebecca Rettig: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rebecca-rettig-8b90a284/
FisherBroyles: https://www.fisherbroyles.com
Kik’s response to the SEC: https://www.scribd.com/doc/420998937/Kik-Response-to-SEC#from_embed
Katherine Wu’s annotations on the response: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ac136ed12b13f7c187bdf21/t/5d4a3cfcfe4cc000019dff3b/1565146371923/KIK_SEC_+Reply+to+Complaint_3.pdf
CoinDesk article summarizing Kik’s reply: https://www.coindesk.com/kik-says-sec-twisted-facts-about-100-million-token-sale
CoinDesk interviews with Kik CEO Ted Livingston, and blockchain attorneys Joshua Klayman, Rebecca Rettig and Nelson Rosario on this week’s information: https://www.coindesk.com/watch-join-coindesk-live-with-ted-livingston-ceo-of-kik
