Capital markets suffered a troublesome 12 months in 2022. Amid an inflationary bear market, the normal investing playbook proved woefully insufficient. The NASDAQ and high-yield debt, the darlings of yesteryear, have, with few exceptions, fallen from grace. US Treasuries, the most typical hedge towards inventory volatility, have suffered their worst drawdown in no less than the final 70 years — and it’s not even shut.
10-Yr US Treasury Drawdown
Occasions akin to these are good alternatives for reflection. Portfolio managers and allocators must construct various portfolios that steadiness development and capital threat over an intermediate-to-long time horizon. Treasuries have historically stuffed the function of diversifier and risk-off asset. However what in the event that they turn into much less efficient hedges towards threat property? Portfolio development might look very completely different. That’s why we have to ask the query: If Treasuries not fulfill their conventional function, what different methods or asset courses can improve diversification and ship constant returns?
Managed futures could also be simply such an asset class — one with the potential for enticing efficiency, particularly amid excessive volatility.
The Development Is Your Pal
John Lintner, a co-creator of the capital asset pricing mannequin (CAPM), can inform and inspire our exploration. In The Potential Position of Managed Commodity-Monetary Futures Accounts (and/or Funds) in Portfolios of Shares and Bonds, he wrote:
“Certainly, the enhancements from holding effectively chosen portfolios of managed [futures] accounts or funds are so giant — and the correlations between the returns on the futures portfolios and people on the inventory and bond portfolios are surprisingly low (generally even adverse) — that the return/threat trade-offs supplied by augmented portfolios consisting partly of funds invested with acceptable teams of futures managers . . . mixed with funds invested in portfolios of shares alone (or in blended portfolios of shares and bonds), clearly dominate the trade-offs out there from portfolios of shares alone (or from portfolios of shares and bonds). Furthermore, they achieve this by very appreciable margins.
“The mixed portfolios of shares (or shares and bonds) after together with even handed investments in appropriately chosen sub-portfolios of investments in managed futures accounts . . . present considerably much less threat at each potential degree of anticipated return than portfolios of inventory (or shares and bonds) alone. That is the essence of the ‘potential function’ of managed futures accounts (or funds) as a complement to inventory and bond portfolios steered within the title of this paper.
“Lastly, all of the above conclusions proceed to carry when returns are measured in actual in addition to in nominal phrases, and likewise when returns are adjusted for the risk-free charge on Treasury payments.”
This passage affords a number of tantalizing clues on the potential function managed futures might play in a portfolio: They might enhance the danger/return profile of inventory and bond portfolios, exhibit meaningfully low correlation with these conventional property, and enhance returns on each an absolute and risk-adjusted foundation. Let’s consider every of those claims in flip.
The Financial Rationale
The first driver of returns for managed futures is trend-following or momentum investing — shopping for property which have just lately risen and promoting or shorting property which have just lately declined. These methods are usually utilized to liquid futures contracts throughout fairness indices, rates of interest, commodities (power, agricultural, and industrial), and currencies, amongst different markets. Since most traders don’t have any commodities or FX publicity, even from the easy perspective of traded devices, managed futures might introduce new sources of threat and return.
Momentum investing has a wealthy educational historical past and is acknowledged as a necessary issue that may clarify inventory portfolio efficiency. Development-following is equally strong. Brian Okay. Hurst, Yao Hua Ooi, and Lasse H. Pedersen analyzed a time-series momentum technique over 137 years and located that it carried out effectively throughout completely different macroeconomic environments and tended to outperform throughout occasions of macro-stress.
The Barclays BTOP50 Index (BTOP50) seeks to duplicate the all-around composition of the managed futures trade in buying and selling model and total market publicity. The chart beneath depicts BTOP50’s quarterly returns from January 1990 to April 2022 relative to these of the MSCI World Index and options the fitted line for a second-degree polynomial. The plot reveals a particular “smile” attribute of trend-followers. This implies that managed futures methods are usually “lengthy volatility” and outperform in each excessive up and down markets.
Barclays BTOP50 vs. MSCI World Index
Set Up and Method
The BTOP50 serves as our benchmark for the efficiency of managed futures methods. We calculate returns and abstract statistics both on a month-to-month or quarterly foundation over the January 1990 to April 2022 statement interval.
Stylized Information
The abstract statistics for the BTOP50 together with indices for different key asset courses are introduced within the desk beneath and are derived from quarterly complete return knowledge. Confidence intervals (95%) for skew and extra kurtosis are proven in parentheses.
In line with the info, managed futures have, on common, produced constructive returns and exhibited roughly half the volatility of world shares over the past 32 years. The 95% confidence interval for skew means that the BTOP50 has distinctly constructive skewness, which is exclusive among the many asset courses in our evaluation. Even “safe-haven property,” like US Treasuries and the US greenback, throughout risk-off durations don’t exhibit statistically important constructive skewness.
The visible proof of this impact is illustrated within the histogram beneath. The arrogance interval for extra kurtosis isn’t fairly conclusive on the 95% degree, however it nonetheless implies heavy tails for the BTOP50. Furthermore, the Shapiro-Wilk take a look at disproves the speculation of usually distributed returns. The Shapiro-Wilk fails, nonetheless, to reject normality for 10-year Treasury and DXY returns. That signifies that these sequence are comparatively effectively behaved.
Barclays BTOP50 Quarterly Returns Distribution
The cumulative return of the BTOP50 and comparative property over the pattern interval are introduced within the following chart. The BTOP50, our managed futures proxy, is the third-best performing asset class, barely edging out Treasuries and falling simply shy of investment-grade corporates. Over the 1990 to 2010 subperiod, which options the dot-com bubble and the worldwide monetary disaster (GFC), trend-following was the highest performer largely as a result of the technique prevented each these giant drawdown occasions and truly posted constructive returns in 2008 and 2009.
Index Cumulative Return
Nonetheless, since then — and till pretty just lately — methods constructed to revenue from value traits have struggled. Because the GFC, markets have lagged beneath their historic norm. This presents a problem to trend-followers. The underperformance of the 2010s interval could also be due partially to the deluge of cash that flooded right into a historic bull market. A interval of imply reversion was inevitable.
Managed Futures AUM (Billions $)
One other vital facet of managed futures, in line with the cumulative return plot, is the low correlation they’ve with the opposite “conventional” asset courses. The chart beneath particulars the rolling 12-month correlation of the BTOP50 with the 5 different asset courses. The strong black line in every plot reveals the typical correlation over all the statement interval.
BTOP50 and Different Asset Lessons : Rolling 12-Month Correlations
Whereas the correlations range over time, trend-following demonstrates structurally low correlation with the opposite asset courses. Let’s study every sequence in flip. The correlation with equities is statistically indistinguishable from zero. Equities are sometimes probably the most dangerous asset in diversified portfolios, which is why they’re usually hedged with property that carry out effectively when shares battle. Over the previous 20-plus years, Treasuries have stuffed this function and, up till 2022, carried out it effectively. However 2022 revealed important gaps in portfolios that rely solely on bonds for draw back safety. Amid as we speak’s high-inflation, sagging development, and excessive volatility, trend-followers have excelled. Relating to diversification, managed futures have achieved exceedingly effectively.
When Issues Get Excessive
Between the smile-plot and correlation diagram, we’re constructing the case that managed futures have a vital function to play in portfolio development. Particularly, managed futures methods have produced persistently constructive returns throughout market regimes and carry out significantly effectively within the tails. Let’s dig just a little deeper into this latter level.
The primary panel within the plot beneath reveals the typical rolling 12-month return for the BTOP50 and MSCI World over the complete pattern interval. The MSCI World has supplied a mean return of ~9.75% since 1990, whereas the BTOP50 has returned ~5.80%. Over an extended sufficient time interval, the sequence with the very best anticipated return will most likely outperform all different property. Nonetheless, because the cumulative return plot demonstrates, the trail to such returns will probably be punctuated by presumably lengthy durations of serious underperformance and volatility.
Within the second and third panels, we kind the returns into deciles primarily based on the MSCI World’s efficiency and reveal how managed futures fare when the MSCI World did significantly effectively or poorly. The third panel reveals the typical 12-month return for the tenth and finest decile. In periods of “good” returns for the MSCI, the typical high decile return for the MSCI World is an excellent ~34%. However, the typical return for top-decile managed futures is just ~7%. So, when fairness markets are in an actual bull run, shares are by far one of the best funding.
The second panel reveals the typical 12-month return for the primary and worst decile. In periods of “dangerous” returns for MSCI, the typical backside decile return is roughly –24%, whereas the typical return for managed futures is a constructive ~12%. That is the vital level: Managed futures have a constructive expectation in each up and down markets, however it’s in down markets when their hedging advantages are strongest: Simply once they’re wanted most.
Imply 12-Month Return by Decile
Now, easy averages are one factor, however what in regards to the excessive circumstances? The following chart depicts the utmost and minimal return for the highest and backside deciles of the MSCI World and the corresponding efficiency of the BTOP50.
Most and Minimal 12-Month Return by Deciles
The second panel reveals the utmost return for the tenth and top-performing decile. Throughout its finest 12-month return interval since 1990, the MSCI World returned ~55% whereas the BTOP put up ~24%. In a ripping bull market, managed futures can produce strong returns, although they in the end received’t hold tempo with shares. Because the BTOP50 has a lot decrease volatility, that is hardly a shock.
The primary and third panels visualize the “dangerous occasions” for shares. The primary reveals the utmost return for the primary decile, the ninetieth percentile, of the MSCI. The least quantity that the MSCI has misplaced over a 12-month interval is roughly –13.5%. In distinction, when the MSCI was down ~13.5%, the BTOP50 was up ~30%. Likewise, the third panel reveals the worst, or one hundredth percentile, 12-month return for the MSCI: a cruel -47%. Over this era, the BTOP50 additionally misplaced cash, however solely a manageable –2.6%.
Bringing all of it collectively, we’ve two vital observations:
Development-following has a long-run constructive anticipated return and, furthermore, a constructive anticipated return in each bull and bear markets.
Managed futures have an uneven return profile. They often fail to maintain tempo with equities in bull markets however can nonetheless produce strong returns. In bear markets, nonetheless, they considerably outperform shares, producing constructive returns or, at minimal, a lot much less draw back.
Concluding Remarks
The elevated volatility of 2022 left few asset courses unscathed. We have to perceive what labored effectively, what didn’t, and the way we are able to higher place our portfolios for the longer term. Managed futures/development following is one technique value contemplating. Development-following sits on a basis of robust empirical proof and a long time of constructive returns. Furthermore, the historical past of managed futures means that the technique works significantly effectively in occasions of macro-economic volatility: It acts as a supply of non-correlated returns proper when traders want it most.
Should you favored this publish, don’t overlook to subscribe to Enterprising Investor.
All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.
Picture credit score: ©Getty Pictures / maybefalse
Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members
CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can file credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.
